After adding new physical drives to a DELL server with a PERC Raid Controller, I ran into an unknown error.
PERC (PowerEdge Raid Controller) controllers are somewhat of a DELL-branded LSI (MegaRaid) storage controller; they can usually be managed using the megacli command.
Note: Starting with PERC series 8, these controllers should be managed using PercCli.
root@dellserver:~# megacli CfgLdAdd -r1 [134:3, 134:4] WB RA Cached -a0
Adapter 0: Configure Adapter Failed
FW error description:
Unknown error
Exit Code: 0x97
Unfortunately the mentioned exit code (0x97) is not very well described in the LSI documentation:
0x97 The LD or device does not support the requested policy.
At first I thought the reason of the error is a typo. I read somewhere that all sub-commands, including "CfgLdAdd", need to be invoked using a leading dash. But this turned out to be a bogus information, as the sub-commands also work without the leading dash:
root@dellserver:~# megacli PDList -Aall | egrep "(Enclosure|Slot)"
Enclosure Device ID: 134
Slot Number: 0
Enclosure position: N/A
Enclosure Device ID: 134
Slot Number: 1
Enclosure position: N/A
Enclosure Device ID: 134
Slot Number: 2
Enclosure position: N/A
Enclosure Device ID: 134
Slot Number: 3
Enclosure position: N/A
Enclosure Device ID: 134
Slot Number: 4
Enclosure position: N/A
Rather through additional try and error I found out that the "Cached" option was not supported by this RAID-1 Logical Drive. Instead the "Direct" option must be used. According to the help output, there's only either Cached or Direct option available:
root@dellserver:~# megacli -h | grep CfgLdAdd
MegaCli -CfgLdAdd -rX[E0:S0,E1:S1,...] [WT|WB] [NORA|RA] [Direct|Cached]
After adjusting the command to use the Direct option, the creation of the new VD / LD worked:
root@dellserver:~# megacli -CfgLdAdd -r1 [134:3,134:4] WB RA Direct -a0
Adapter 0: Created VD 1
Adapter 0: Configured the Adapter!!
Exit Code: 0x00
To explain it best, error 0x97 most likely means you have selected an option which is not possible in this Logical Drive setup. As I could not find any other example on the WWW, I thought I'd write that down.
Update January 18th 2024: Updated article with new findings. The leading dash in the sub-command was not the reason for the 0x97 error.
No comments yet.
AWS Android Ansible Apache Apple Atlassian BSD Backup Bash Bluecoat CMS Chef Cloud Coding Consul Containers CouchDB DB DNS Database Databases Docker ELK Elasticsearch Filebeat FreeBSD Galera Git GlusterFS Grafana Graphics HAProxy HTML Hacks Hardware Icinga Influx Internet Java KVM Kibana Kodi Kubernetes LVM LXC Linux Logstash Mac Macintosh Mail MariaDB Minio MongoDB Monitoring Multimedia MySQL NFS Nagios Network Nginx OSSEC OTRS Office PGSQL PHP Perl Personal PostgreSQL Postgres PowerDNS Proxmox Proxy Python Rancher Rant Redis Roundcube SSL Samba Seafile Security Shell SmartOS Solaris Surveillance Systemd TLS Tomcat Ubuntu Unix VMWare VMware Varnish Virtualization Windows Wireless Wordpress Wyse ZFS Zoneminder